Most of the tree "disappear" in Windows, but in LR/PSD you can see more. Look at the background trees to the left of the center tree. In the XnView Wiki, you can improve the user guide / documentation / F1-help for XnView (classic/Windows) and for XnViewMP. I've uploaded the image here if anyone wants to try for themselves: As of XnView MP 0.93.1, a curve tool exists, see menu bar > image > adjust > curves, which supports custom presets - hence, you could once define a curve that only lightens shadows and later on re-use it quickly. Die aktuelle Version von XnView MP ist 1. Adobe still has the best print engine in my experience. I personally use the free Adobe Bridge CC, plus Photoshop Elements (with the Elements + plug-in-about 11) for photo editing. It is not optimal having to soft proof images towards sRGB every time. The debate between Photoshop Express vs Lightroom has been going on for. Unfortunately, Photoshop Elements 8 was the last version with a really good true Adobe Bridge organizer. This tells me that there is "some heavy" black point compensation going on in Lightroom - which is not optimal. Other great apps like Picasa are FastStone Image Viewer, ImageGlass, XnView MP. If I turn of black point compensation in Photoshop (and restarts) it actually looks the same as in Windows. With Pictorial, you get access to an extra mile. Cataloging - XnView MP is much, much better here. as long as there is no clipping, all the data is still there in the tiff. there's a lot of mysticism around raw files. Not to the same degree that an 8-bit raster image format would, but you lose much of the flexibility of the raw file. XnView MP starts with a small window (it should be maximized IMHO) but it provides a much more cleaner interface if you want to print metadata / captions etc. Even a 16-bit TIFF 'bakes in' WB, contrast, black point, white point, etc. If I soft proof the image with profile set to sRGB - it displays the same way (dark) as in Windows applications. Both have a plethora of options which IMHO are seldom needed. If I reimport the exported JPEG into Lightroom - it displays "correctly" again (same brightness) as the original. The color is correct - it is just the shadows becoming darker. This is the case even if I open the image in a color managed Windows application e.g. This article presents a comparison of image viewers and image organizers which can be used for image viewing. If I export an image from LR to JPEG+sRBG and view this in another Windows application, some of the details in the shadows disappear - the shadows look a bit darker. XnView and XnViewMP Thumbnails (user-defined sizes), fullscreen, slideshow, zoom, fit, view IPTC and Exif info Resize, crop, rotate, flip, JPEG lossless rotate/flip/crop, adjust exposure and colors etc. It is properly HW-calibrated and the correct profile is set in Windows. I have a strange issue - or it might be that this is normal behaviour.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |